<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 100 Million Dollar Form Redesign: A Responsive Solution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designingwebinterfaces.com/100-mil-dollar-form/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designingwebinterfaces.com/100-mil-dollar-form</link>
	<description>Site for Designing Web Interfaces Book</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 02:00:44 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kirk</title>
		<link>http://designingwebinterfaces.com/100-mil-dollar-form#comment-127614</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 02:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designingwebinterfaces.com/?p=2121#comment-127614</guid>
		<description>@Theresa, thanks for the answer - had no idea that was a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Theresa, thanks for the answer &#8211; had no idea that was a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theresa Neil</title>
		<link>http://designingwebinterfaces.com/100-mil-dollar-form#comment-127613</link>
		<dc:creator>Theresa Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 21:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designingwebinterfaces.com/?p=2121#comment-127613</guid>
		<description>@Mudassir
Good catch, I updated the article to explain we &lt;em&gt;tested&lt;/em&gt; on these devices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mudassir<br />
Good catch, I updated the article to explain we <em>tested</em> on these devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theresa Neil</title>
		<link>http://designingwebinterfaces.com/100-mil-dollar-form#comment-127612</link>
		<dc:creator>Theresa Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 21:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designingwebinterfaces.com/?p=2121#comment-127612</guid>
		<description>Hi Kirk, I asked the same question when we were working on this. Apparently there are major problems with fraudulent donations, so we have to verify the donor is human. Bots can easily generate credit card information, but not pass a CAPTHCA test. However, we did try to improve the UX around the CAPTCHA control. The old one was almost indecipherable, whereas the new one is easier and mobile optimized. And we are hoping to add a audio reader to it in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kirk, I asked the same question when we were working on this. Apparently there are major problems with fraudulent donations, so we have to verify the donor is human. Bots can easily generate credit card information, but not pass a CAPTHCA test. However, we did try to improve the UX around the CAPTCHA control. The old one was almost indecipherable, whereas the new one is easier and mobile optimized. And we are hoping to add a audio reader to it in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk</title>
		<link>http://designingwebinterfaces.com/100-mil-dollar-form#comment-127611</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 19:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designingwebinterfaces.com/?p=2121#comment-127611</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious - why are you using a CAPTCHA on the donation form? I would have thought that use of a credit card would be enough of an anti-spam measure, and that the CAPTCHA could potentially turn away donors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious &#8211; why are you using a CAPTCHA on the donation form? I would have thought that use of a credit card would be enough of an anti-spam measure, and that the CAPTCHA could potentially turn away donors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UI Does Matter!&#187; Blog Archive &#187; The 100 Million Dollar Form Redesign: A Responsive Solution</title>
		<link>http://designingwebinterfaces.com/100-mil-dollar-form#comment-127608</link>
		<dc:creator>UI Does Matter!&#187; Blog Archive &#187; The 100 Million Dollar Form Redesign: A Responsive Solution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 22:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designingwebinterfaces.com/?p=2121#comment-127608</guid>
		<description>[...] via The 100 Million Dollar Form Redesign: A Responsive Solution. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via The 100 Million Dollar Form Redesign: A Responsive Solution. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mudassir Azeemi</title>
		<link>http://designingwebinterfaces.com/100-mil-dollar-form#comment-127607</link>
		<dc:creator>Mudassir Azeemi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 22:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designingwebinterfaces.com/?p=2121#comment-127607</guid>
		<description>Hi,

A quick question, why you guys chose the &quot;Devices&quot; instead of &quot;Viewport&quot;? Any specific decision factor that leads you guys to chose the Responsive Design decision on the basis of &quot;device&quot; instead of &quot;viewport/breakpoints&quot; ?

Take Care,

Mudassir</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>A quick question, why you guys chose the &#8220;Devices&#8221; instead of &#8220;Viewport&#8221;? Any specific decision factor that leads you guys to chose the Responsive Design decision on the basis of &#8220;device&#8221; instead of &#8220;viewport/breakpoints&#8221; ?</p>
<p>Take Care,</p>
<p>Mudassir</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
